CCC-banner-logo 17jan09
email: climatez@climatecampaign.info
website: www.climatecampaign.info
home
take action now
campaign diary
helpful links
about us
our policy
Citizens Climate Campaign
Take Action Now
NSW Action on
Solar Feed-in
Tariff Scheme
Walk Against Warming - Sydney, 2008
Walk Against Warming - Sydney, 2008

The State Government has finally announced it will
introduce a solar feed-in tariff for householders.

With more and more Australians opting to install solar panels, this is good news. A decision on the details of the scheme will be made shortly.

If this scheme is to play its part in reducing the State's greenhouse emissions, it is critical the framework is right.

People should be rewarded if they choose to invest thousands of dollars to actively make a difference to the State's greenhouse pollution levels by generating their own renewable energy.

The Nature Conservation Council believes a strong solar feed-in tariff must pay householders for all of the electricity they produce (called a gross feed-in tariff), not just for the surplus electricity that isn't used in the household and is fed back into the grid (net feed-in tariff). Currently the NSW government only wants to pay for the excess energy produced. A strong, gross solar feed-in tariff is an essential part of tackling climate change. The scheme adopted in the ACT operates on a gross tariff as does the German model.

Walk Against Warming - Sydney, 2008

The incentive should be available to businesses as well as households. This would help small businesses diversify their income and create opportunities for large-scale renewable energy. The NSW Government wants to limit incentives to households.

A net feed-in tariff will disadvantage households and businesses which use the electricity they produce during the day, and have little to export to the grid. In consequence, it will take much longer to recoup the cost of the initial solar installation, which is a disincentive.

The NSW Government only wants a scheme to include rooftop solar panels. However, to provide an incentive for large-scale renewable power that can feed into our homes and businesses, the scheme should cover all renewable energy technologies.

Such a scheme would make a significant contribution to tackling climate change and would reduce NSW's dependence on coal-fired electricity. Compared with 1990, carbon emissions from NSW have risen 30%, which means that we have a huge job ahead just to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions, much less meet the modest 5% cuts now proposed for 2020 (Sydney Morning Herald 12.1.09).

Carmel Tebbutt at the Walk Against Warming - Sydney, 2008

If you are a NSW resident, you can send the following prepared message to the Hon. Carmel Tebbutt, Minister for Climate Change and the Environment, by clicking here.

Including comment of your own would show your personal concern about this issue, and would make it look different from the hundreds of others we hope will be sent.



The Hon. Carmel Tebbutt,
Minister for Climate Change and the Environment.

Dear Ms Tebbutt,

I congratulate the NSW Government on its intention to introduce a solar feed-in tariff scheme. However if this scheme is to play its part in reducing the State's greenhouse emissions, it is critical that people be rewarded if they choose to invest thousands of dollars to actively make a difference to the State's greenhouse pollution levels by generating their own renewable energy.

I believe the foundation of the scheme should be a gross feed-in tariff, which would pay householders for all of the electricity they produce.

A net feed-in tariff will disadvantage households and businesses which use the electricity they produce during the day, and have little to export to the grid. In consequence, it will take much longer to recoup the cost of the initial solar installation, which is a disincentive.

Such a scheme would make a significant contribution to tackling climate change and would reduce NSW's dependence on coal-fired electricity. I understand that, compared with 1990, carbon emissions from NSW have risen 30%, which means that we all have a huge job ahead just to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions , much less meet the modest 5% cuts now proposed for 2020.

I urge your Government to give NSW citizens the best scheme possible so they can make their contribution to this enormous task.

Name:
Address: